Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work
Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which fluctuate depending around the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation in the state court is probably not appropriate, as well as accepted, within the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of your boy or Female never approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they can Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will choose care of every one of the facets of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
For those who find an error during the content material of a published opinion (such as a misspelled name or maybe a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
10. Without touching the merits with the case in the issue of once-a-year increases from the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision on the provincial government, such once-a-year increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment to become made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
twelve. There isn't website any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Therefore, this petition is admissible based on founded court precedents, plus the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Summaries give a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, as well as procedural areas of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.